Presentation: How Many Judaisms Were There?
Seth  Schwartz, Jewish Theological Seminary
This  paper is a critique of the idea of Judaismlessness, which shares with  its predecessor -- the idea that there were "Judaisms" in antiquity --  the fact that it is rhetorically extreme shorthand for a set of ideas  which, whether or not they prove to be valid, certain merit careful  analysis. On one level, the correct response to Judaismlessness is  straightforwardly empirical: Steve Mason may be battled effectively on  his own positivistic turf. But Mason's argument, and Boyarin's  appropriation of it, also raise fundamental issues about the entire  project of writing about ancient Judaism (for lack of a better  formulation), chief among which is in my analysis of the following:  given that, strictly speaking, we can never eliminate anachronism and  ethnocentrism (which amount to much the same thing) from the way we  think about an "other," what then are we entitled to say about it? This  may seem a rather strange and general concern to derive from a small  body of scholarship about a small group (if that is what they were) of  people who ostensibly lived long ago, but for various reasons, some of  them a result of the character of the ancient sources and others of  modern interests, the Jews provide an opportunity to address these  issues in an especially focused way. One of the core critiques of  "Judaism" is that the word apparently denotes a religion, a category  whose applicability to antiquity, indeed perhaps to any period before  the Enlightenment, is questionable, or at least debatable. I will argue  for a pragmatic but highly cautious approach to the issue, while  acknowledging the validity of the critique. 
Key  readings:
S. Mason, "Jews, Judaeans,  Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History," JSJ  38 (2007) 457-512.
D. Boyarin, "Rethinking Jewish  Christianity: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (to which  is Appended a Correction of my Border Lines)", JQR 99  (2009) 7-36.
Additional readings:
M.  Satlow, "Defining Judaism: Accounting for 'Religions' in the Study of  Religion", JAAR 74 (2006) 837-60.
T. Asad, Genealogies  of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam,  Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993, 27-54.
C.  Brumann, "Writing for Culture: Why a Successful Concept Should Not Be  Discarded", Current Anthropology 40, Supplement, (1999) 1-13,  with responses following, especially Lila Abu-Lughod and Ulf Hannerz.
B.  Nongbri, "Dislodging 'Embedded' Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly  Trope", Numen 55 (2008) 440-60
S. Cohen, The  Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties, Berkeley-Los  Angeles: University of California Press, 1999, 109-39.